| IEICE Technical Committee Submission System Conference Paper's Information |
Online Proceedings [Sign in] Tech. Rep. Archives |
| Go Top Page | Go Previous | [Japanese] / [English] |
| Paper Abstract and Keywords | ||
| Presentation | 2012-09-28 10:40 Performance comparison of subjective quality assessment method for 3D video Taichi Kawano, Kazuhisa Yamagishi (NTT)  CQ2012-51 |
|
| Abstract | (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
| (in English) | Recently, 3D video services have become popular. It is important for service providers to design an application and network on the basis of subjective quality perceived by users in order to provide users with a high-quality 3D video. Although many subjective quality assessment methods for video services have been proposed and standardized, there is no criterion to choose a method. Therefore, we need to study how we choose a method. However, it has not been sufficiently clarified which method is the most suitable for assessing 3D video quality in terms of a difference threshold between mean scores and assessment time. In this paper, to determine criteria for selecting a suitable method for 3D video, we compared ACR, DCR, DSCQS, and ACR-HR methods in terms of a significant difference between mean scores and assessment time. The results indicated that the DSCQS method is the most suitable for high-quality videos and the DCR method is the most suitable for other videos in terms of a difference threshold when the number of participants for each method was 42. Furthermore, we clarified that the ACR method is the most suitable in terms of a difference threshold when total assessment time is the same for all methods by changing the number of participants for each method. | |
| Keyword | (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
| (in English) | 3D video / Subjective quality assessment method / ACR / DCR / DSCQS / DSCQS / / | |
| Reference Info. | IEICE Tech. Rep., vol. 112, no. 218, CQ2012-51, pp. 53-58, Sept. 2012. | |
| Paper # | CQ2012-51 | |
| Date of Issue | 2012-09-20 (CQ) | |
| ISSN | Print edition: ISSN 0913-5685 Online edition: ISSN 2432-6380 | |
| Copyright and reproduction |
All rights are reserved and no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Notwithstanding, instructors are permitted to photocopy isolated articles for noncommercial classroom use without fee. (License No.: 10GA0019/12GB0052/13GB0056/17GB0034/18GB0034) | |
| Download PDF | CQ2012-51 |
|
| Conference Information | |
| Committee | MoNA CQ |
| Conference Date | 2012-09-27 - 2012-09-28 |
| Place (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
| Place (in English) | Kagawa pref. Takamatsu-city |
| Topics (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
| Topics (in English) | Mobile network, mobile service and application, multimedia contents and delivery, and their quality, General area |
| Paper Information | |
| Registration To | CQ |
| Conference Code | 2012-09-MoMuC-CQ |
| Language | Japanese |
| Title (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
| Sub Title (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
| Title (in English) | Performance comparison of subjective quality assessment method for 3D video |
| Sub Title (in English) | |
| Keyword(1) | 3D video |
| Keyword(2) | Subjective quality assessment method |
| Keyword(3) | ACR |
| Keyword(4) | DCR |
| Keyword(5) | DSCQS |
| Keyword(6) | DSCQS |
| Keyword(7) | |
| Keyword(8) | |
| 1st Author's Name | Taichi Kawano |
| 1st Author's Affiliation | Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) |
| 2nd Author's Name | Kazuhisa Yamagishi |
| 2nd Author's Affiliation | Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) |
| 3rd Author's Name | |
| 3rd Author's Affiliation | () |
| 4th Author's Name | |
| 4th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 5th Author's Name | |
| 5th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 6th Author's Name | |
| 6th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 7th Author's Name | |
| 7th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 8th Author's Name | |
| 8th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 9th Author's Name | |
| 9th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 10th Author's Name | |
| 10th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 11th Author's Name | |
| 11th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 12th Author's Name | |
| 12th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 13th Author's Name | |
| 13th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 14th Author's Name | |
| 14th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 15th Author's Name | |
| 15th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 16th Author's Name | |
| 16th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 17th Author's Name | |
| 17th Author's Affiliation | () |
| 18th Author's Name | |
| 18th Author's Affiliation | () |
| Speaker | Author-1 |
| Date Time | 2012-09-28 10:40:00 |
| Presentation Time | 30 minutes |
| Registration for | CQ |
| Paper # | CQ2012-51 |
| Volume (vol) | vol.112 |
| Number (no) | no.218 |
| Page | pp.53-58 |
| #Pages | 6 |
| Date of Issue | 2012-09-20 (CQ) |
[Return to Top Page]