| IEICE Technical Committee Submission System Conference Schedule |
Online Proceedings [Sign in] Tech. Rep. Archives |
All Technical Committee Conferences (Searched in: All Years)
| Committee | Date Time | Place | Paper Title / Authors | Abstract | Paper # | |
| TL | 2014-08-12 17:15 |
Tokyo | The University of Tokyo (Komaba) 18 Bldg. Hall | Processing subject and object relative clauses with numeral classifiers in Japanese Baris Kahraman (Univ. of Tokyo/JSPS), Kei Tanigawa, Yuki Hirose (Univ. of Tokyo)  TL2014-24 |
In this study, using a self-paced reading task and sentence fragment completion task, we investigated the influence of m... [more] | TL2014-24 pp.73-78 |
| TL | 2013-08-03 15:35 |
Osaka | Kwansei Gakuin University, Osaka Umeda Campus | [Poster Presentation]
Resolving Relative-Clause Attachment Ambiguity in L2 Japanese
-- Turkish-speaking learners and native speakers of Japanese -- Yoko Nakano (Kwansei Gakuin Univ.), Baris Kahraman (Univ. of Tokyo) TL2013-19 |
(Advance abstract in Japanese is available) [more] | TL2013-19 pp.29-32 |
| TL | 2013-08-03 15:35 |
Osaka | Kwansei Gakuin University, Osaka Umeda Campus | [Poster Presentation]
Reflexive interpretations in Turkish Baris Kahraman (Univ. of Tokyo), Aydin Ozbek (Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ.) TL2013-20 |
Turkish has two divergent forms of reflexive pronouns: kendi (self) and kendisi (self-3sg). In the literature, different... [more] | TL2013-20 pp.33-38 |
| TL | 2012-07-21 15:20 |
Yamagata | Yamagata University | [Poster Presentation]
When is the object relative clause easier to process than the subject relative clause? Atsushi Sato (Nanzan Univ.), Baris Kahraman (Canakkale Univ.), Hiromu Sakai (Hiroshima Univ.) TL2012-17 |
[more] | TL2012-17 pp.41-46 |
| TL | 2011-08-06 10:00 |
Hiroshima | Hiroshima Univ. | Why object clefts are easier to process than subject clefts in Japanese
-- Frequency or expectation? -- Baris Kahraman (Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ.), Atsushi Sato (Hiroshima Univ.), Hajime Ono (Kinki Univ.), Hiromu Sakai (Hiroshima Univ.) TL2011-20 |
Previous studies have shown that both frequency and expectation for upcoming structures play an important role on senten... [more] | TL2011-20 pp.67-72 |
| TL | 2010-08-05 15:35 |
Tokyo | Kikai-Shinko-Kaikan Bldg. | Processing two types of ditransitive sentences in Turkish
-- Preliminary results from a self-paced reading study -- Baris Kahraman, Atsushi Sato, Hiromu Sakai (Hiroshima Univ.) TL2010-17 |
In Japanese sentence processing, Miyamoto and Takahashi (2002, 2004) showed that the [NOM>DAT>ACC] order is easier to pr... [more] | TL2010-17 pp.37-42 |
| TL | 2009-07-18 16:30 |
Fukuoka | New Century Plaza II, Hakozaki Campus of Kyushu Univ. | [Poster Presentation]
Processing Japanese subject and object relative clauses by advanced learners:
-- Comparison with native speakers by a whole-sentence reading experiment -- Baris Kahraman, Atsushi Sato, Mariko Koide, Mariko Uno, Miwa Takemura, Hiromu Sakai (Hiroshima Univ.) TL2009-18 |
Previous studies have shown that subject relative clauses (SRCs) are easier to process than object relative clauses (ORC... [more] | TL2009-18 pp.57-62 |
| TL | 2008-08-09 11:30 |
Miyagi | Hotel Onikobe | Processing Object Relative Clauses in the Context
-- Another Support for the Discourse Function Account for the Processing Load Asymmetry -- Atsushi Sato, Baris Kahraman, Hiromu Sakai (Hiroshima Univ.) TL2008-30 |
Roland et al. (2007, 2008) argued that the processing load asymmetry between object and subject relative clauses (ORCs/S... [more] | TL2008-30 pp.95-100 |
[Return to Top Page]